The Independent London Newspaper
22nd February 2012

Letters

Council tenants take rents rise battle to estates

Cllr Julian Fulbrook

Petition launched with pleas to ‘show more fight’

Published: 26 January 2012
by RICHARD OSLEY

COUNCIL tenants are going door to door across Camden’s estates to drum up support for a petition opposing rent hikes.

Tenants’ leaders do not believe plans ratified last week to raise rent by 8.1 per cent – more than double the rate of inflation – have sunk in with most residents and that many are in for a shock when bills arrive.

They want councillors to “show more fight” and work with tenants on a campaign against the rise, beefed up by joining with like-minded local authorities in London and elsewhere in the country.

Tenants’ representatives appeared before the Labour cabinet of senior councillors last Wednesday and then met again on Monday night to discuss extending the campaign further.

With service charges due to rise, tenants face paying an extra £10 a week each.

Fran Heron, chairwoman of Camden Town District Management Committee, told the cabinet that residents were “incensed that no other options have been provided and that we were presented with a take-it-or-leave-it scenario.

We also question the need to adhere to the government’s set formula.”

She said that tenants were aware that Camden was receiving less money from government and that “the council is jammed between a rock and a hard place”.

But Ms Heron told the meeting: “We have major concerns about the impact the proposed rise in rent and heating charge increases will have on the most financially vulnerable tenants.”

She warned that people could fall into a “poverty trap”, adding: “Public sector workers facing wage freezes face the full 8.1 per cent hike in rents.

Those in low-paid employment are unlikely to have had any rise in wages and will face the full force of the increase from their meagre disposable income.”

Camden is divided into five housing districts. Tenants in four of them have voted to oppose the increases. Holborn tenants’ leaders have accepted the rise.

At the Camden Town headquarters of Camden Federation of Tenants’ and Residents’ Associations (CFTRA) on Monday night, tenants’ reps agreed to take a petition around the estates.

It calls on the council to stand shoulder to shoulder with tenants by taking deputations to London Mayor Boris Johnson and the government.

Petra Dando, from Camden Association of Street Properties, told Monday’s meeting that councillors had to take a stronger line with the government.
“The tea and sympathy approach is not good enough,” she said.

One of the underlying fears is that rents will not only go up this year but inch closer to market rents in the next few years, making Camden unaffordable to current council tenants.

The front-page headline of the current edition of CFTRA’s newspaper, the Camden Tenant, defiantly reads: “No near- market council rents”.

Lib Dem group leader Councillor Keith Moffitt has argued that Camden is not as strait-jacketed by government policy as it claims, while Green Party councillor Maya De Souza this week called for a rent cap.

Labour councillors are acutely aware that a tenants’ campaign could prove damaging, especially if there is a revolt on the major estates.

They are talking privately of getting to a stage where they can set a three-year rent plan, which would reassure tenants they would not be hit with big hikes in the coming years.

Sources blamed government uncertainty over funding for this not having been done already.

Labour housing chief Councillor Julian Fulbrook said: “It’s a shame that the government is launching the new era of ‘self- financing’ by effectively forcing the council to raise rents to balance the housing accounts.

This increase is significantly higher than the government’s 5.2 per cent increase in the state pension and is not helpful for people already struggling to pay higher energy and household bills.”

He added: “The high rent increase is in stark contrast to the government’s approach elsewhere, where they have found extra resources to limit council tax increases.”

See Comment

Comments

Inside Experience

A woman I grew up with got a Camden council studio, ground floor since she "needed" disabled access. Once in, she became a tenant rep and wangled her way into a bigger flat upstairs. This was done on the sly, not through the normal points system, as she's not officially entitled to an extra bedroom. Now I dare say she will be one of the people opposing the rent rises. This is despite the fact she's only worked one year in over 33 of her possible working life (not through disability for the first 25, through refusal). So there she is in Camden while working stiffs like myself struggle to afford anywhere near our London workplaces. PATHETIC.

where is the £2.88 million/yr. on tenant participation spent >?

Camden housing is the most disgusting dept. of the council. There are a bucket load of useless AD;s paid thousands -
Tenant Groups are vote banks , paid for and controlled by the council.
First they agree on the rent increase and then quickly shuffle up a petition !
smart, eh / ha ha.

Apparently the meeting was attended by just 20 tenants...

Looking at the "See Comment" link. This is not surprising. It's a sad fact that the vast majority of council tenants have their peppercorn (compared to market rate) rents paid by housing benefit. Especially recently allocated tenants who will all have to be unemployed and on benefits as otherwise they wouldn't have enough "need" for the allocation based on the perverse and bizarre "needs" based allocation system. Hardly surprising then that there is so little interest in council rent rises from most council tenants as the taxpayer will pay any increases for the vast majority of them. Perish the thought that Camden would actually allocate one of their flats to someone who works for a living and actually does pay their own rent...

Rent Increase

What the so called tenant 'reps' fail to mention are all the freebies they have received from the council out of tenants rent money, the laptops, printers, expensive ink cartridges for the printers, mobile phones etc etc etc.

The freebies these so-called reps receive in the name of 'tenant participation' adds to the cost of housing management and the ever increasing rises in council tenant rents and charges.

Would they be so eager to put themselves up as tenants reps if they weren't 'paid' (in kind) to do so?

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.