The Independent London Newspaper
17th May 2012

Letters

Difficult to swallow: truth of drugs war that’s being lost

Published: 19 January, 2012
by JOHN GULLIVER

HESITANTLY, she stood outside the chemists.   

Then she strode inside, past the jewellery counter, past the shelves of toothpaste, deodorants, cough mixtures... until she got to the main counter where medicine is prescribed.

The pharmacist called her to one side, only a few words were exchanged, and then he gave her a small phial containing green, sickly looking stuff which she gulped down, pulling an ugly face.

She was one of 60 drug addicts a day who call in at this particular chemist in Camden for their daily fix of methadone.

It happens to be a chemist I have used for years but it was only the other day that the pharmacist – quite accidentally – mentioned his methadone run.

Of the 60 addicts who wind their way into his premises, 30 are “supervised” – that is, watched as the dose is swallowed, and recorded.

The other 30 are given their “drink” in little green phials to take home for consumption Everything has to be tightly regulated, with proof downloaded to the clinic responsible for the addict’s medication.

At the first visit the addict even has to be fingerprinted by the chemist to keep within regulations.

Several years ago only two or three addicts a day were on the chemist’s list.

“It’s getting worse,’ he sighed. “I don’t know the cause – what can you say,  probably family breakdown.

“Sometimes, I talk to them, to give them some hope.

The problem is they have no one to talk to.

Who do they mix with all day?

Usually, other addicts.

It is such a terrible cycle.

But they are usually very well behaved though sometimes they get out of control, and attempt to steal things.

“They come from all different backgrounds, high and low.  Occasionally, their parents will see me and offer compensation for anything stolen – you can see the misery on their faces.”

For you or me, an encounter with an addict is rare. Perhaps you will see one in the street, and more than likely try and avoid him or her.

But the pharmacist I have known for many years sees 60 of them every day.

Imagine, the despair on so many faces, every day, the same faces.

Knowing him, I didn’t think he would ever have got hardened enough not to be affected.

I was right. His brow furrowed, he started talking about his own family.

He was more aware than ever how important it was to remain close to his sons – both at university – so that whatever was laying waste to the people who came into his chemists would pass him by.

He is a professional man, with a London university pharmacy degree, but has become caught up in a dirty world simply out of his duty to the clinic run by the NHS. It’s a world you and I don’t see much of – but it is out there, proof that the war on drugs isn’t being won.

Comments

Sterotypical hysteric rubbish

Better that addicts are on methadone than taking dangerous illegal street drugs that they have to commit crime to pay for.

What would you rather have, a recovering addict taking a legal medication in a pharmacy, or a drug addict commiting crime to fund their habit?!

Many people take methadone daily and lead perfectly normal lives, have jobs houses, families etc, but of course that doesn't make good print does it??!

Far better to have hysterical stories about these "terrible people".

How about printing a story about how successful methadone can be when prescribed and used correctly?
But that wouldn't be scandalous enough for you would it!

This type of reporting keeps perpetuating the myth that opiate substitute prescribing does not work, when in fact the evidence base for it's efficacy has been around for many years.

It is a total fallacy tht you can look at a person and "know" that they are on methadone, and you do yourselves no favours by reporting such rubbish biased untruths.

I am quite appalled.

methadone

I would disagree with the statment that " an encounter with an addict is rare ". There are many people for whom methadone taken daily has stabilised their lifes to the point where they are in full time employment & do not use any illicit substances. Those people are indistinguishable from any other person leading productive lives.
The statement is like saying that you can tell what medication a person takes just by looking at them, whether it be a diabetic or somebody else with a medical problem that they need to medicate themselves with on a daily basis.
It would be more accurate to say that an addict who is not in treatment is more easily spotted as they have to rely on illicit heroin which they have to obtain from the criminal black market, causing them to finance their addiction by shop-lifting & other such criminal activities.
Without a legal substitute medication which is listed by The World Health Organisation as an " essential medication ", then all opiate addicts would have to turn to the criminal black market, leading to even more criminal activity as we see at present.

side effects

what do you expect when the mental health budgets are cut?

maybe those who obsess about "Savings First" imagine there is no gain without pain!

Post new comment